Beelink SER8 Review AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS Powered Mini PC

5

Beelink SER8 Internal Hardware Overview

Inside the system, we can see that Beelink made some major efforts on the cooling.

Beelink SER8 Internal Configured
Beelink SER8 Internal Configured

If you look at the system, the front I/O ports are on their own PCB and there is a hole between that and the main motherboard PCB to allow for better airflow.

Beelink SER8 Empty Memory Slots
Beelink SER8 Empty Memory Slots

Here is a quick look at the system without memory and with the SSD heatsink pulled away.

Beelink SER8 Internal Unconfigued 2
Beelink SER8 Internal Unconfigued 2

Our 1TB NVMe SSD is covered by a heatsink that can handle up to two SSDs. Also, given the dust cover design, it means we need to unscrew eight screws before we get to the SSDs.

Beelink SER8 Dual M.2 SSD Slots With Heatsink Removed
Beelink SER8 Dual M.2 SSD Slots With Heatsink Removed

In terms of memory, our system came standard with two 16GB DDR5-5600 SODIMMs from Crucial. That gives us a total of 32GB of memory.

Beelink SER8 32GB Crucial DDR5 5600
Beelink SER8 32GB Crucial DDR5 5600

WiFi in this system is a bit strange. It is still an Intel AX200 which is a WiFi 6 solution. WiFi 6 is good, but since we are starting to see systems with draft WiFi 7 cards, it feels like WiFi 6E should be standard.

Next, let us get to the performance.

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS Performance

The CPU here is an AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS.

Beelink SER8 Windows 11 Pro Device Manager
Beelink SER8 Windows 11 Pro Device Manager

Given that we have an 8-core/ 16 thread Zen4 CPU, we know the performance that we can expect.

Python Linux 4.4.2 Kernel Compile Benchmark

This is one of the most requested benchmarks for STH over the past few years. The task was simple, we have a standard configuration file, the Linux 4.4.2 kernel from kernel.org, and make the standard auto-generated configuration utilizing every thread in the system. We are expressing results in terms of compiles per hour to make the results easier to read:

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS Linux Kernel Compile Benchmark
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS Linux Kernel Compile Benchmark

We added the Beelink SER7 results here. While this is an upgrade, it is not necessarily a system we would sell the SER7 to upgrade to the SER8 for. This is more of an incremental performance gain.

7-zip Compression Performance

7-zip is a widely used compression/ decompression program that works cross-platform. We started using the program during our early days with Windows testing. It is now part of Linux-Bench.

Beelink SER8 And ASRock Industrial BOX 4x4 8840U 7zip Compression Benchmark
Beelink SER8 And ASRock Industrial BOX 4×4 8840U 7zip Compression Benchmark

That SER7 versus SER8 performance is a theme we are going to see quite often here.

OpenSSL Performance

OpenSSL is widely used to secure communications between servers. This is an essential protocol in many server stacks. We first look at our sign tests:

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS OpenSSL Sign Benchmark
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS OpenSSL Sign Benchmark

Here are the verify results:

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS OpenSSL Verify Benchmark
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS OpenSSL Verify Benchmark

Again, we get a small, but consistent generational gain here.

Geekbench 5 and 6 Results

Just so you can easily compare this to your own system, we have a number of Geekbench 5 and 6 results. We have both Windows and Linux runs for comparison. Here are the Geekbench 5 runs:

Beelink SER8 Geekbench 5 Windows
Beelink SER8 Geekbench 5 Windows
Beelink SER8 Geekbench 5 Ubuntu
Beelink SER8 Geekbench 5 Ubuntu

Here are example Geekbench 6 runs:

Beelink SER8 Geekbench 6 Windows
Beelink SER8 Geekbench 6 Windows
Beelink SER8 Geekbench 6 Ubuntu
Beelink SER8 Geekbench 6 Ubuntu

In both cases, we got slightly better performance on Ubuntu 24.04 versus Windows 11.

Next, let us get to the power consumption and noise.

5 COMMENTS

  1. wlp3s0 on that diagram is the WLAN interface. enp2s0 is the wired Ethernet connection. Surely that’s self explanatory…

  2. It doesn’t look like Beelink is on the cutting edge of airflow design( “please dust regularly” is six screws in?); but it’s nice to see a vendor in this size class at least willing to recognize that an extra vertical centimeter or so is vastly better than having to listen to a tiny fan screaming under the smallest heatsink and slimmest vents you can technically get away with; one wishes that more would do so. I assume that Intel was trying to make a bold statement in a world of mostly-empty minitowers back when ‘NUC’ first became a thing; but too-tight adherence to a mostly arbitrary size target has left a lot of subsequent systems unnecessarily noisy and with really cramped port layouts; so it’s nice to see someone willing to target what is sensible for their requirements.

    As for USB; I’d be a little curious what throwing a USB 3.2 hub in something like this would cost. It looks like, when you go with laptop chips, you really do get that few ports to work with; but if you aren’t on a laptop power budget throwing in a hub just to eliminate the irritation of plugging a flash drive into the wrong port and having it be really, really, slow (rather than just “oh, this drive is silently based on a 3.1 controller and just marked ‘USB 3’ or uses cheap flash and doesn’t care” slow-ish but significantly faster than USB 2). Obviously a hub isn’t going to cut it if you’ve got a 4k framegrabber on every port or something; but that’s a fairly niche use case, likely more of a thunderbolt or USB 4 one, while having zero surprise USB 2 ports; even if some of the USB 3 type A ports are oversubscribed, seems like it could be worthwhile if the price is right.

  3. As long as the unit is under warranty, I would probably use a good permanent Marker and (if I can find it again), my ruler with lettering template to label the USB ports. That is, if the back of the case there is indeed metal (so I can remove the labels with some acetone or similar).
    But yes, it’s a bit annoying that one would have to resort to such tactics, which is more what I’d expect to do for a Raspi-like build.
    The other question is, of course, if I should just wait for the first Strix mini-PCs to come out. That 790M iGPU seems to be significantly better than
    the 780M in these Phoenix/Hawk APUs.

  4. I got a Topton Ryzen 7730 for £230 (and now it’s cheaper at £190). Add 64GB of Crucial RAM and a 2TB WDC TLC SSD, it’s still cheaper than this for pretty much the same grunt.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.