Sometimes, you just want cheap and relatively fast. This is the XikeStor SKS8300-8X which might be one of the cheapest 10G switches you can buy. The 8-port SFP+ switch is interesting because it is currently under $90. If it gets a sale, it is likely to go sub $80 or $10/ port. Unlike many cheap 10GbE switches, this one is far from an unmanaged switch, but that is worth discussing. First though, let us get the hardware.
If you just want to get one, we got ours on Amazon (Affiliate link.)
As a quick note, we have several folks on the forums using these successfully. There are others that have had strange behavior such as in this thread. It is certainly worth looking online to see if this is something you are interested in.
XikeStor SKS8300-8X Hardware Overview
On the front of the switch, we get a console port as well as eight SFP+ ports for our 10G. You can also see these have 1/2.5G indicators as well as the 10G option.
This is a managed switch, and it comes with a USB to console cable. These always make us nervous since we do not love the idea of plugging in USB to serial cables that we did not buy since these tend to be a security threat vector.
The switch itself is very short depth.
On the sides, we have vents.
On the back we have a grounding point and our DC input.
Underneath, we have our label that has our default management interface. There are also rubber feet in the box you can use if you are using this as a desktop switch. If you are mounting it, there are two mount points.
Opening up the switch we have a big heatsink. This heatsink uses a lot of glue to keep it on so we did not get to pry it off since that might damage our unit.
Still, something slightly nice about the build is that there are thermal pads underneath the PCB which is usually the sign of a slightly higher quality switch.
Next, let us get to the management.
Curious article. No expression of concern over the fact that 1 SFP inserted raised the power consumption level to 8.3W for a device the article says has a 24W power supply.
Kinda under-powered if you plan to utilize the entire switch, eh?
A managed switch with poor security seems much worse than an unmanaged switch with 8 ports. What do people even do with the management interface on an 8-port switch? There are only 8 ports.
I’d love to replace a mostly useless and annoying Qnap switch with device today (and might).
The Qnap switch I use with 8x 1g and 4x 10g ports, 2x 10g to my upstream switch with aoc, one to my desktop with tx, one to an old desktop I use as a server at my desk via sfp+ twinax, and hand off some 1g tx ports to gadgets I keep on my desk. It however is such a useless switch that even though managed, I can’t change the native IP management vlan on it that is NOT vlan 1. Support said they might fix it, and that was a year and a half ago.
Don’t ever, ever buy Qnap for networking.
I just want a switch with 4x 10g and 4-8 1g ports. Sadly no one really makes one other than stupid Qnap.
Actually, I’d be curious to know @Patrick how the CLI is on this, and if useful for any actual configuration. Qnap’s is again useless for any actual configuration, I don’t even know why they put a serial port externally on it.
I just need to run a management IP on another vlan, say 10 instead of vlan 1, and the Qnap can’t even do that.
6.3W base + 2W per port is 16W so that’s 22.3W at the wall or maybe 20W if the adapter’s good at the device so 24W PSU is fine. Those adapters use more than copper SFP+ and optics so I don’t see an issue at all.
From the picture in the article, XikeStor switch’s web interface looks very similar to Ruijie switch’s one. I wonder if they come from the same OEM.
@Eric Olson: The management interface can be useful even on a small switch if you want to aggregate things on different VLANs over a single link, like say a security camera, IP phone, WiFi access point and a point-of-sale device. These can all be on different VLANs but you only have to run the one cable out for them.
It can also make troubleshooting easier, because you can connect to the switch remotely and spot that say a device is disconnected, and give someone instructions to check the cable before you go to the trouble of a site visit.
The insecure management interface isn’t a huge deal because it’s usually isolated on a separate VLAN as well, with only limited access available. I mean sure it could be better, but there are so many insecure devices out there already that need to be handled on the network that it’s nothing out of the ordinary.
@Quy Nguyễn the OEM for most of these is likely to be Shenzhen HongRui Optical Technology Co., Ltd (hruitech.com). The base models on most of them are exactly the same as the Web- and L2-managed switches. L3 versions come with an additional processor to handle some functions.
Generally the CLI is terrible or non-existent, many functions dont work as expected (SNMP, EEE, SSH, user security, VLAN config, saving and restoring config). The OEM expects their ‘partners’ to build these functions but none do and you end up using the bare-bones device where you cant swap a different firmware in, and the default one is too basic for any STH user.
I had multiple of them, and ultimately traded for a Zyxel 10G L2+ model with a Noctua fan-mod. The CLI works, SSH works, users and security work as I expect, EEE and flow-control work, ARP table is accurate and the 10G ports actually give line rate.
is there also support for 100mbit?
or is this depending of the sfp+ module?
Concerned about the secutiry of a USB lead but not a Made in China switch. Interesting.
Elijah did you see the management section?
I have that same switch but labeled as binardat. You must tell it if you’re using Fibre or dac cables or it won’t play, and apart from that I’ve had it crash using the web guitar a few times….but once setup it just runs and runs and runs, no issues whatsoever. Bought mine used from ebay for I think 35 bucks without a psu and spent a few bucks on that.